Quasi-experimental methods are an increasingly important tool for marketing scholars. This work aims to broaden the understanding of quasi-experimental methods among marketing scholars and those who read their work by describing the underlying logic and set of actions that make their work convincing.
Access Classroom Lecture Slides
Goldfarb, Avi, Catherine Tucker & Yanwen Wang (2022), “Conducting Research in Marketing with Quasi-Experiments,” Journal of Marketing, 86 (3), 1-20. Doi: 10.1177/00222429221082977
This article aims to broaden the understanding of quasi-experimental methods among marketing scholars and those who read their work by describing the underlying logic and set of actions that make their work convincing. The purpose of quasi-experimental methods is, in the absence of experimental variation, to determine the presence of a causal relationship. First, the authors explore how to identify settings and data where it is interesting to understand whether an action causally affects a marketing outcome. Second, they outline how to structure an empirical strategy to identify a causal empirical relationship. The article details the application of various methods to identify how an action affects an outcome in marketing, including difference-in-differences, regression discontinuity, instrumental variables, propensity score matching, synthetic control, and selection bias correction. The authors emphasize the importance of clearly communicating the identifying assumptions underlying the assertion of causality. Last, they explain how exploring the behavioral mechanism—whether individual, organizational, or market level—can actually reinforce arguments of causality.
Special thanks to Holly Howe and Demi Oba, PhD candidates at Duke University.
Search other Insights in the Classroom
Read a managerial summary of this paper.
More from the Journal of Marketing