JM Insights in the Classroom
The value of creativity is subject to longstanding debate and recent reports highlight how marketers are increasingly growing skeptical of advertising creativity and decreasing their investments in it. This paper outlines why doing so is a mistake and how marketers can get the most out of their investments in advertising creativity.
Access Classroom Lecture Slides
Related Marketing Courses:
Marketing Communications; Marketing Strategy
Rosengreen, Sara, Martin Eisend, Scott Koslow, and Micael Dahlen (2020), “A Meta-Analysis of When and How Advertising Creativity Works” Journal of Marketing
Although creativity is often considered a key success factor in advertising, the marketing literature lacks a systematic empirical account of when and how advertising creativity works. The authors use a meta-analysis to synthesize the literature on advertising creativity and test different theoretical explanations for its effects. The analysis covers 93 data sets taken from 67 papers that provide 878 effect sizes. The results show robust positive effects but also highlight the importance of considering both originality and appropriateness when investing in advertising creativity. Moderation analyses show that the effects of advertising creativity are stronger for high- (vs. low-) involvement products, and that the effects on ad (but not brand) reactions are marginally stronger for unfamiliar brands. An empirical test of theoretical mechanisms shows that affect transfer, processing, and signaling jointly explain these effects, and that originality mainly leads to affect transfer, whereas appropriateness leads to signaling. The authors also call for further research connecting advertising creativity with sales and studying its effects in digital contexts..
Kelly Gullo and Holly Howe, Ph.D. candidates at Duke University supported the authors teams with submissions to this program.
Search other Insights in the Classroom
Read a managerial summary of this paper.
More from the Journal of Marketing